Consider a friend whose Day Master is feeble, relying on their earthly branch counterpart for support; it is more conducive for them to engage in joint ventures with others, promising gains. Should both parties depend on each other as earthly branch counterparts, mutual benefit can be achieved. However, if only one individual relies on the other, profits favor the dependent while the other suffers loss. Conversely, if one’s destiny dictates the earthly branch counterpart as a taboo god, it is unwise to engage in joint ventures with others, leading inevitably to losses.
These principles, though fundamental, are subject to exceptions. For instance, despite one’s destiny calling for reliance on their earthly branch counterpart, if the latter is weak or falls into void, it signifies an immature condition for collaboration. Proceeding forcefully under such circumstances often backfires. Conversely, if one’s destiny designates the earthly branch counterpart as a taboo god, yet its influence is weak or in void, it indicates a potential for profitable collaboration. This dialectical relationship necessitates nuanced understanding, a stumbling block for many novices in the study of destiny when confronted with more intricate destinies. Responsibility Editor: (This website:)